Windows 7 To Break Backwards Compatibility


Previous versions of Windows provided backwards compatibility with older versions of windows, making it easy for users to upgrades as their favorite programs would still work.

However, with Windows 7 Microsoft are approaching backwards compatibility differently, and Windows 7 will not be binary compatible with older versions. This won’t mean that older programs won’t run, but that virtualisation will be used to make them run. The key drivers for this are performance improvements, but also in an attempt to sidestep regulatory programs.

Vista struggles with performance because Microsoft choose to incorporate regulatory challenged features like Internet Explorer and Windows Media Player using a modular design, rather than the monolithic processes used in previous versions of windows. The greater use of componentisation led to performance issues due to the increased number of libraries within the operating system. Simply put, the more separate files your hard drive has to load, the slower your system is going to run.

Another reason why Vista runs so slowly is:

The operating system stores multiple copies of core system libraries, as each revision of a library typically adds/removes functions, and applications compiled with dynamic links to a specific version of a DLL file may call on functions not present in the currently installed library. Vista aims to solve this issue through the WinSxS collection; essentially a massive store of every differing version of libraries present on the system. That way, when an application makes a call for a dynamically linked library, Vista queries the WinSxS cache for the correct version, which is then loaded into memory. On the average system, this directory can be several gigabytes in size, with much of the code duplicated between the separate versions many times.

By not being binary compatible with previous versions of Windows and being built from the ground up, will give Windows 7 significant performance improvements. This will make it easier for developers to produce faster apps as they won’t have to worry about backwards compatibility, but it will increase the upgrade pain for users who may find that some of their existing applications will no longer work and will need upgrading.

Where do you lie on the trade-off between compatibility and speed? Do you think Microsoft are making a mistake here?

Bookmark & Share

About the Author

author photo

Everton is based in London and has worked in the internet and mobile space for over ten years now, and before that worked in corporate strategy and consulting. He has a degree in Economics from Cambridge University, and currently runs the Portal and online operations for one of the largest ISPs in the UK. He also writes for Connected Internet

See All Posts by This Author

There Are 42 Responses So Far. »

Pages: [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All

  1. #42

    @ James Harding
    It’s not going to have the same interface. Early milestones of ‘Longhorn’ looked exactly like XP, remember? Vista has a bad image due to compatibility issues, good to see they will fix that with Windows 7; ha! Reminds me of the sudden PPC to Intel Macs craze. I like the idea of a virtual XP or Vista to run old binaries.

  2. #41

    it just seems odd to me that Windows 7 looks no different to Vista. As much as I believe the eye candy on Vista to be a waste of time, a new graphical look always make me think that the designers have made a new operating system opposed to a ‘tweaked’ operating system.

Pages: [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Subscribe without commenting

Post a Response


Comment Policy: Any comments are permitted only because the site owner is letting you post, and any comments could be removed for any reason at the absolute discretion of the site owner.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1093 access attempts in the last 7 days.