Windows 7 Expectations


When Microsoft announced Windows Vista everyone had high expectations for that Microsoft operating system and it’s pretty safe to say that Windows Vista could not live up to those expectations in many areas. Expectations for Windows 7 are therefor directly related to those that Windows Vista was not able to deliver.

Windows Vista was not a failure but it had the problem that Microsoft was creating expectations that Windows Vista could not match. A lot of Vista users are perfectly happy with their system but there is probably an equally large number of users who do not like it and stick with Windows XP instead.

There are several key areas where Windows 7 has to make an improvement over Windows Vista. It’s not only a performance issue although that one is definitely pressing. Windows Vista has hardware requirements - and I’m not talking about the suggested hardware but hardware where it runs solid on - that caused disappointment in many users who updated from Windows XP to Windows Vista with their old computers.

Users who bought a new PC with Windows Vista did not encounter that many performance issues because their PCs were usually equipped with better hardware.

Windows 7 Expectations:

  • Resource Friendly / Performance: Windows 7 should not continue the trend of Windows Vista and put computer hardware of the last year to the limit. Performance issues are the biggest complaint of Windows Vista users.
  • Edition Chaos: Vista Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, Vista Enterprise, Vista OEM.. I’m not sure why Microsoft decided to fork out that many Vista editions for the market but I can definitely say that this leads to confusion by the consumer. Four Editions are definitely enough: Windows 7 OEM, Windows 7 Home, Windows 7 Business and Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Listen to the customers: Many users have the feeling that Microsoft is not listening to them.
  • Modularity: Windows “forces” several features and functions on the user even if he does not want or need them. Modularity would be helpful where the user could turn those features on and off without interfering with system stability and performance.
  • Layout: Giving the user more choice in how he places the elements on his screen. For the Taskbar it could mean: Resizable Taskbar, moving the Start button from left to right or top to bottom, removing and adding elements to the taskbar, configurable clock output

Do you have expectations ? If so let me know about them so that we can collect a nice list.

Bookmark & Share

About the Author

author photo

Martin Brinkmann is an Online Journalist from Germany who discovered his love for technology in high school. He is currently working as a freelancer for several publications and runs his own Internet website Ghacks

See All Posts by This Author

There Are 44 Responses So Far. »

Pages: [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All

  1. #44

    “However, it worries me that Windows 7 may not be as resource-intensive, because does this mean that Microsoft will do away with the lovely transparency that makes Vista so pretty?”

    Not if Microsoft does it right. Take a look at the system requirements for CompizFusion, or any of the myriad third party apps that give you transparency with xp (or 95), or of OSX. all of them are significantly lower then Vista’s.  That’s the biggest problem with vista’s reqs, their much higher then they should be given what the cometition can do

  2. #43

    Thanks to the article, well thought out. I searched for a while to find the right answer to my questions!

  3. #42

    Performance, Modularity and Layout. Well said! You’ve summed it up well. The average user (of which I’m one) is not a fully funded/fledged Geek who to use the latest OS is going to go out and upgrade/buy a new PC just to maintain performance levels. Nor should I have to play around enabling/disabling features or using third party software to achieve optimum operational performance.

  4. #41

    I’m a Vista user and have been since May 2007. I’m happy with it and love it, but being a techy geek, I am also eagerly anticipating the release of Windows 7. However, it worries me that Windows 7 may not be as resource-intensive, because does this mean that Microsoft will do away with the lovely transparency that makes Vista so pretty? I’m a woman after all, I like my laptop to look good and perform well too! I certainly wouldn’t mind forking out for better hardware or a completely new machine if I had to. I did that for Vista and it didn’t bother me at all. People should expect to upgrade when a new OS is released, I simply assume that I will have to anyway. Having said that, I do buy a new laptop every year…

Pages: [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Subscribe without commenting

Post a Response


Comment Policy: Any comments are permitted only because the site owner is letting you post, and any comments could be removed for any reason at the absolute discretion of the site owner.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1093 access attempts in the last 7 days.