What will Apple’s response be to Windows 7, Part 2

Tip: Click here to run a free scan for common PC errors

There’s been a few comments recently on my article “what will Apple’s response be to Windows 7“, and it’s hardly surprising as any conversation about Microsoft and Apple / PCs and Macs will always get a debate going.  In part I think the recent interest will be because of the news that Steve Jobs has returned to work after a period of illness.

Many commentators are saying that there’s very little between the two operating systems, and indeed Linux, these days.  I’d say this is extremely accurate.  All the operating systems do the same things in broadly similiar ways.  They have the same features, all generally look similar and it can be hard sometimes for a casual observer to tell them apart.

The differences all come in the implementation.  Microsoft have always gone for the ’simple’ approach while Apple’s focus has always been on making things ‘easy’ (which brings up the whole Windows 7 Simple vs Easy argument again).  The implementations are different and different operating systems will suit different people and different ways of working.  Anyone who comments “Mac’s are better because” or “Windows is best because” should really be saying it’s just better for them!

This brings me on to Windows 7 vs Snow Leopard which are even more similar because both Microsoft and Apple have announed that their latest operating systems are focusing on being smaller and quicker than the previous versions.  Now, even the development cycles are the same.

Suffice to say though that Apple WILL have a response to Windows 7 and I don’t believe it’s going to be a pretty one.  Rather than let Snow Leopard stand on its own merits, the battle will be waged on TVs and billboards, we’ve already seen the first signs of it, and in the run up to October 22nd we can be sure that Apple will be slinging as much mud at Microsoft as possible.

This, I believe, will be their only response as, because the operating systems are all so similiar these days, it’s the only response they can give.  It’s a shame because it’s slowly turning Apple into the nasty company they’ve always tried so hard not to be.  But in the middle of a financial crisis and in a global competitive marketplace, is it all that big business can be?

The question also has to be asked how behaviour such as this can possibly be in the best interests of consumers.

Microsoft’s response so far to these adverts has been pretty considered and professional.  They should keep this up and not get drawn into professional mud-slinging.  This way they might finally be able to take the moral high ground that Apple have occupied for so long.

Comments invited.

Subscribe To RSS Feed Updates

('DiggThis’)

Leave A Comment: Comments

Filed Under: Windows 7 News

Tags:

Need Windows 7 Help? Click Here
Next Post: »»
Prev Post: »»

About the Author: The author of the new Windows 7 Power Users Guide, a how-to guide for non-technical Windows users on how to get the best out of Microsoft's new operating system, with step-by-step and quick guides. You can follow Mike on Twitter or on his own website The Long Climb

  • What will Apple’s response be to Windows 7, Part 2 http://is.gd/1li7U


    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • the MP
    absolutely. apple is going to go on bashing 7 saying its still like vista and all this junk. in the end, they will really end up looking like desperate liars because people will be able to tell the huge difference with 7 and enjoy it. a good way to put it is that: they act the way their intended market does...like kids
  • Matt
    I'm not a kid, I'm a professional designer.
    And I think Apple's response will be a heck of a lot cheaper and more thoughtful than that of  remember 300 million dollars being wasted on two commercials staring Seinfeld, or when they started getting people saying they were PCs when clearly they were human...
    I don't think the Mojave Experiment met expectations either, nor the Laptop Hunters ads which didn't promote Windows in any way.
    I have a feeling Apple are just better at advertising. I agree you can only hit Microsoft with Vista so many times, but now Windows 7 is out I'm sure they will find a way to "bash" it.
  • Apple seems to be always making mistakes. They have already stated that Windows7 is just Vista, and guess what, that's TRUE, it IS Vista minus the stuff that we hated about it!
    Apple is going to throw a fit about how Microsoft can get 'away' with taking the same OS and changing it a 'little bit'. And you know what, that's what Microsoft did, they changed Vista a 'bit' to make it better! Just like Snow Leopard is just Leopard under the hood!
  • Normally I hate to comment on the other author's articles, but I'd like to point out two things:
    1. There are huge, fundamental differences between Windows and Macintosh or GNU/Linux. Whereas Windows is based on MS-DOS, both GNU/Linux and Macintosh are similar to UNIX. Although the GUI may appear similar to the most basic of computer users, anyone who can do more than save files and open an internet browser will instantly notice significant differences, such as the Dock for Macs or the Panels for GNU/Linux (and Windows just gets an ordinary, single taskbar).
    2. It is not "Linux," it's GNU/Linux. Linux is a kernel, GNU/Linux is an OS.
  • What will Apple’s response be to Windows 7, Part 2: There’s been a few comments recently on my article “what wil.. http://tinyurl.com/kmjm7k


    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • A lot of people have compared the new Windows 7 superbar to the OS X dock. They are very similiar in many ways, though there are still obvious differences too.

    Also when I referred to Linux, this is obviously in a generic way.
  • "there are still obvious differences too"
    This is my point. They have the same purpose, but they are different. Saying that the Dock is similar to the Superbar is like saying that OpenOffice (or KOffice) is similar to Microsoft Office 2007.
    As for GNU/Linux, Linux is wrong. This was my point. It's an incorrect reference.
  • You can use simplepie to parse RSS and display anywhere in your blog.

    http://simplepie.org/


    This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/07/02/launching-otaku-gadgets/#comment-169230" rel="nofollow" title="“Launching Otaku Gadgets” (http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/)">Connected Internet

  • the MP
    @ MATT
    what apple mostly does in its ads is not only blatantly lie, but also over exaggerate their claims and attacks and generalize and stereotpye the windows userbase. msft doesn't resort to this CHILDISH behavior. many mac fanbois i come across act like childish zealots with lame-O arguments that attack everything and anything non-a[[;e no matter how objective the report or story.
    while i didnt get or like the seinfeld ads, apparantly there were a lot who did but whatever, that was a waste of money in my opinion. the people claiming they are pcs is no different fro mjustin SHlong and the other guy saying they are mac and pc. what that ad does and i feel works very well, is break that stereotype that apple has cast on windows. people of all shapes, types, abilities, personalities, and sizes use windows or what mac has labled as 'pc' windows isn't just for business nerds.
    while the laptop hunters doesn't discuss windows per se, what they do is outline the financial benefits of buying a laptop with windows.
    honestly, i dont know what they can find to bash 7 with. its so stable, fast, and utterly amazing, so the only thing they can do is flat out lie, exaggerate, and focus on the past or talk smack on the price.
    apples mac ads were funny at first, but now they are old, tired, and make me hate them more for acting like KIDS.
    im a pro media tech (work with all sorts of video, audio, images, animation, and effects) who uses my custom windows pc at home and mac at work. just FYI
blog comments powered by Disqus